Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods, while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a debate about wether producers or customers should take responsibility of reducing the amount of packaging of goods. While some argue thue that it is better for the manufacturers and supermarket to implement this practice, others contend that this should be done by consumers. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and offer my own views.
On one hand, companies have significantly promoted environmental awareness among their customers by minimizing the amount of packaging, Many supermarkets today have committed to transform the packaging to biodegradable or recyclable materials, thus contributing to preserving the environment. In addition, By being responsible for reducing packaging, companies might facilitate purchasing processes since consumers may not have to categorize productions.
On the one hand, customers also play an important role in alleviating environmental consequences by avoiding buying packaged productst. Although the effects of single action are limited, the cooperation of a whole community can create significant changes. For example, if customers simultaneously boycott goods with excess packaging, manufacturers might have to go into a compromised decision, using environnmentally friendly materials instead. However, it also requires close collaboration of each customer to be sucesseful on large scale.
In conclusion, Both companies and individual should take responsibility for reducing the use of packaging. Morever, some environmental protection organizations can help a hand to turn this practice into activism by investing regularly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people suggest that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do Some people believe it is necessary but others think that it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both these views and give your own o 71
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04405286344 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52210288286 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.665198237885 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2563495039 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.727272727 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303123576311 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10081003261 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711249193796 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167347928303 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681303483818 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.