TASK 2: The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Is this a positive or negative development?
In the era of technology, online conversations are gradually replacing meeting in person. From my point of view, it is apparent that there are numerous positive aspects, and this trend is also malicious exploitation.
It’s undeniable that social media gives human superiority by bringing the ease of communication. To be specific, entrepreneurs, who usually have business trips far from home can relieve their homesickness by video calling with their families via Facebook, WhatsApp. Another application of social media in the information transmission is organizing online meetings, which Zoom and Microsoft Teams allow users to do with their business partners.
In addition to the positive impacts to the human beings, online communication can lead to unsustainable relationships. In the 4.0 era, people can easily make new friends by swiping on dating apps such as Bumble and Tinder. Even though their social networks can be extended, they can also be cut off by ignoring messages. Moreover, face-to-face interactions tend to reduce since everyone is busy with their personal life and we can contact with others in only one click.
To sum up, social media is the convenient tool used widely in the modern life. However, I personally believe it still has some negative consequences on human interactions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | phuongchi17899 | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Nowadays people are able to use internet to do an increasing number of tasks Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Competition for university study is becoming increasingly strong Why are universities becoming more competent Is this a positive or a negative development 73
- The process shows how waste glass bottles are recycled Write a report of at least 150 words describing the main details 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 205.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4243902439 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08067222282 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.692682926829 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8041527514 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176740020452 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601607206633 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399771258856 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096665166411 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02458505049 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.