The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries. However, educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and
governments should spend more money on this. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that government should spend more funds on teaching adults who are not be able to read and rather than educating youngsters. I agree with this opinion, however; I still believe that the education of young people is potential part in the socioeconomic development. I will prove my viewpoints in this essay below.
On the one hand, designing an appropriate curriculum for adults who didn’t have opportunities to go to school is necessary. Actually, if people are sufficiently educated, especially adults, they can contribute more, not only to them but also to the next generations. One clear example is teaching their children. It is true that parents with whom youngsters spend most time in the first stage of their life play a principal role in educating them beside school. Family members are people supporting teachers teaching the adolescents at home and helping them understand the lessons taught in class more efficiently. In the other words, teaching adults who cannot read or write is the effective strategy to minimize the illiteracy rate of the entire population.
In contrast, I believe that the education for young people should be given the equal attention. There will be numerous serious consequence if we neglect to teach the children who are the next generation contribute to the development of countries. As the results of the growth of children who are not fully educated, the companies will suffer from a shortage of human resource in the area of mind use. Therefore, the governments will have to make more attempt to deal with arising problems.
To sum up, although educating illiterate adults is the significant problem, I personally believe that teaching the children also needs to be equally concentrated.
- Task 2 For schoolchildren their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 67
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods TV microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Water usage in Sydney The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...re funds on teaching adults who are not be able to read and rather than educating ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, in contrast, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18661971831 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9088748284 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6745597052 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272438512196 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885893091314 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750906173148 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167192186583 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913431964846 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.