Teachers and parents
It is true that teachers at school make a greater impact on children’s intelligence and social development than their parents. I totally disagree with this statement because teachers and parents play the same role in encouraging children's development.
The children usually spend most of their day time on studying and improving themselves at school which is the golden opportunity for teachers to affect their development process. The teachers can enhance children’s intelligence by conveying the knowledge in various subjects with an extremely correct level. This would be a great chance for them to reach the solid background for pursuing the higher education in the future. Moreover, the active interaction in class with a proper coordination from teachers can help children develop other essential skills such as: communication, teamwork, presentation and problem solving. These activities held by teachers contribute significantly to the perfect balance in school children’s development.
Thank to the close bonding in family, parents also have the considerable influence on children’s mental and social development at night time or weekends. Parents often help their children to deal with difficult homework at home. This is a great chance for them to support and improve children’s intelligence development by adding another practical knowledge which may be missed by teachers. In addition, parents also play indispensable role in stimulating children’s social development by giving useful advices for real life situations and taking them to many interesting places to make new friends and broaden their horizon. For instance, creating opportunity for cooking in the kitchen can help children to enhance their creativity as well as social skills.
In conclusion, I think that teachers and parents are two extremely important factors in the life of school children and have the same level of influence in developing their intelligence and social thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-31 | Lethanh54 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | An Hai Nguyen | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74747474747 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24443577884 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542087542088 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9247311509 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232126359323 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101916632197 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790717414796 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187802785518 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683431595161 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.