In this technological era, personal information is held on computers by many companies and organisations. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The pracice of storing private information of users on companies' servers is a major topic of concern these days. Although there are more benefits to consider for both the customers and the companies, the drawbacks in terms of date privacy seem greater.
The act of creating and maintaining a database of the personal information of users is beneficial in a few aspects. Utilising machine learning and big data technologies, a company may understand their customers better. This means that companies may provide better services or make products that exactly suit customer needs. In addition to this, it would be more convenient for users when they continue to use the product or service of that company. Those who use electronice wallets, for example, may get their online transactions done in a matter of seconds if their identity and biometric data are already on the system.
Despite these advantages, when the personal data of a user is kept on the database of their product or service provider, they may have to deal with more significant disadvantages. The first is that companies may sell this data to advertising agencies, who will then use it to bombard the user with a huge number of advertisements on all digital media platforms and social networks, be it a news website or even Facebook. The result of this is often that the user is annoyed constantly when they use the Internet. From an information security perspective, this practice is even more problematic as there is a risk that sensitive data of the user is compromised. In this scenario, hackers may use the data they steal to blackmail the user or illegally withdraw money from the user's bank accounts.
In summary, storing private data of users on the system of a company is a common practice that not only creates convenience for the users and helps the company improve customer experience. The advantages, however, are dwarfed by substantial disadvantages, including personal data security breach and the annoyance from advertisements the user has to experiecne when they are online.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to the nations or international charities discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pracice of storing private informati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, then, as to, for example, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11176470588 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91921803058 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505882352941 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5510504791 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969755091473 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440799359027 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260627925655 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665499788883 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116933397128 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.