Teenagers are spending an increasing amount of time on the Internet, and this is having a negative effect on their social skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people are becoming potential victims of online media by getting addicted to it. This happens by using the Internet more and more often for different purposes, and the teenagers are particularly affected. I completely agree with the statement that this worrying trend might have some dire consequences on their interpersonal relationships and on their ability to work in a team at their workplace in the foreseeable future.
To begin with, this tendency on using the Internet mainly for all the activities in a youth' s life can affect their relations with their families and friends, putting them at risk of becoming socially isolated. To illustrate this, take the example of a teenager who is spending most of his free time playing online computer games or chatting on Facebook or Twitter, instead of undertaking outdoors activities such as going out with friend or doing recreational sports, namely tennis, swimming and others alike, which implies social contacts with their peers. As a result, that person will have less connections with the surrounding world and become an introvert.
Furthermore, by meeting people only on Internet will bring have some drawbacks on a youth' personality, which might affect his future role in society towards others. For instance, isolating himself and communicating exclusively online, will be a hindrance in his struggle to become a sociable persona, able to get involved in a team project which is mandatory to be successfully completed. Therefore, he will lose his working-in-a team ability, if ever had, which can lead to poor performance at work or even being dismissed.
To conclude, ignoring the genuine matters in their lives such as spending valuable time with families and friends in detriment of having mainly online activities can have some negative effects on their capacity of making friends and working with others in their adulthood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-18 | Tran Mai Phuong | 51 | view |
| 2018-02-16 | marta | 47 | view |
| 2015-05-09 | kenoky | 90 | view |
| 2014-11-22 | M.E. Faris | 100 | view |
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 73
- The diagrams show a structure that is used to generate electricity from wave power Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- By paying more to employees based on their performance levels, you can keep their motivation high. Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees? 44
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 594, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun connections is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ers. As a result, that person will have less connections with the surrounding world ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28052805281 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85943077676 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597359735974 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.0600415261 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235578717937 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848436641192 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673238692556 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145991184085 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070439554015 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.