Television, radio, and newspapers influence our society, opinions and views. Do you agree or disagree?
Information has been playing the vital role for centuries. Some people claim that an attitude towards various topics in modern societies is developed under the effect of different media sources. I strongly agree with this opinion since mass media is currently the predominant source of information and validation of news is becoming harder every day.
Nowadays, television, radio, newspapers, and the internet demographics covers most population of our planet. TV or radio devices and computers are currently possessed by every household making it a perfect for news consumption. While youngsters prefer to obtain the same service in the internet with a number of recorded TV shows and radio airs, eldery people rely on physically printed and distributed newspapers, which both represent the same information but in different formats. For example, according to the last Times public poll, approximately ninty-five percent of population uses mentioned media formats on a daily basis. Thus, mass media is the most utilitized source of information for a diverse audience.
In addition to above-mentioned, due to abundance of news providers, the verification of content is turning into a complicated process, which is usually omitted by the majority of individuals. Therefore, most political forces exploit it by broadcasting misinformation to increase their ratings or even fake news to sabotage their opponents. Since numerous people tend to believe in conspirology, such alternative sources of media hold its target audience and their ratings. For instance, the youtube channel of Russia Today is rated among most watched internet mirrors of traditional TV shows. In other words, some leaders spread fake information with media to improve their reputation and influence opinions.
In conclusion, I believe that media plays a significant role in shaping minds of population by being most popular and unverifiable source of information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-11 | Anh Thi | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | vttphuong.d19 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | Nguyễn Văn Việt | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Kiwi | 82 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 78
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in foreign countries Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks 78
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons In other words it is a governmental problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n with media to improve their reputation and influence opinions. In conclusion...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60884353741 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08944849876 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.980948348 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0665255300224 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227556597851 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306371106568 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0364945078906 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297735024971 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.