Research into medical treatments are essential to improve health and fight disease.
Who do you think should fund this research: individuals, private companies or governments?
The quality of medicine has allways played a vital role in the societies wellbeing. However, the question regarding the appropriate source of funding for research in this area is highly debatable. This essay will discuss why private companies are the bad option for individuals and why authorities are the right choice.
On one hand, drug and tools manufacturers benefit from selling their products, which are able to fight various diseases. This means that the quality of final goods or services is essential to maximize their profits, that forces private companies to allot extra resources to improve their product. However, additional expences on research entail a rise of prices, which are covered by citizens that are a final consumers. For example, according to the US Department of statistics, about 10 per cent of americans went bankrupt because of unaffordable healthcare invoices. In other words, when medicine is developed on private funds, ordinary people pay any improvement through their bills to hispitals, pharmacies, etc, which decreases the overal living standards of citizens.
Another approach that is implemented in socialist countries in Europe is a public funding of most scientific efforts in the field of the drug discovery and the special equipment invention. Since authorities are capable to manage financial flows of an entire society through taxation, their financial participation in the field of medicine is significantly more efficient. Hence, prices of final healthcare bills for people are notably smaller. For instance, the market of medical services of Germany is twice smaller per capita than the corresponding market of the US with shorter life length expectancy in America. Thus, the government ought to render full assistance to organisations that are involved in the development of any aspect of human health.
In conclusion, this essay highlighted the main reasons for private capital in medicine to be the bane for a society and why senators should play the major role in this.
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this causes problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play Discuss both views 61
- The number of old people is increasing in many countries Some people think this causes problems whilst other people think that old people have an important role to play Discuss both views 61
- People who read for pleasure have better imagination and reading skills than those who prefer watching TV To what extent do you agree 61
- Television radio and newspapers influence our society opinions and views Do you agree or disagree 11
- The government should ban smoking in all public places even though this would restrict some other people s freedoms Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
... has allways played a vital role in the societies wellbeing. However, the question regard...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consumer'?
Suggestion: consumer
...re covered by citizens that are a final consumers. For example, according to the US Depar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40378548896 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88887349404 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593059936909 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6150546935 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.357142857 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176716368063 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051843615203 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481338880834 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103144918637 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390685062422 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.