The tendency for human beings to copy others can be shown in the poplarity of fashion in clothes and other consumer goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Many individuals hold the view that humans tend to replicate each other through fashionable clothes they put on and commodities that they harness. In my opinion, I completely agree with this perspective.
It is true that more and more ordinary people have been pursueing the same clothing styles which are considered as the most popular ones. The prime example of this tendency could be observed in most social events in Vietnam, where celebrities are inclined to dress up trendy and elagant outfits, which are advertised by globally influential fashion icons or from fashion shows likd Paris fashion week. Putting on these luxurious clothes could make them more confident, showing their socialconomic status. Another example could be seen in daly life, most inhabitants, particularly younger generation, often go for the garments that are novel and popular. Some even copy exactly style of their idols such as Son Tung MTP, one of the mose renowed singer in Vietnam, whose fashion style is regarded as freshed and elagant.
Besides copying other's clothing styles, people in the present days also emulate each other via consumer goods. It is the case that prior to coming to a certain grocery or electrical stores to purchase their necessary items, consumers tend to ask others for advice whether these products are highly well-made and they would pick out these if their advisers agree. This trend could be seen in all kinds of products, ranging from foodstuffs to electronic gadgets. To illustrate, buyers would head for an Iphone if some of their friends are using it and hailing it as an excellant smartphone that they have ever used compared with other brand names like Samsung or LG.
In conclusion, I strongly advocate that people nowadays are replicating each other, especially in terms of trendy clothes and commodities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-02-15 | Khalsa kaur | 94 | view |
- The consumption of the world’s resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 89
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages? 84
- The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall a public place for hiring over the period of three years 74
- Space exploration requires vast sums of money. Is the amount of money spent on space research justifiable? Could the money be better spent? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this if' or 'these ifs'?
Suggestion: this if; these ifs
...ighly well-made and they would pick out these if their advisers agree. This trend could ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1711409396 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59057142588 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.046768187 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.416666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250955183619 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824071326809 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580937435385 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136806726217 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375265158553 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.