There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone?
Smartphones have transformed the way people communicate with each other. However，it also leads to some undesirable effects. This essay will attempt to analyze the negative impacts related to mobile phones and discuss why smartphones have more disadvantages than advantages.
Mobile phones adversely influence our social life as it leads to disconnection between individuals. With the popularity of social media, such as WeChat and Instagram, people tend to send messages to others instead of conducting a face-to-face conversation. People may gradually lose the ability to socialize and empathize. In this way，individuals may experience a sense of isolation as they cannot share their emotions, such as happiness，sadness or even anger, with another human being.
Moreover, mobile phones increase the chances of having medical concerns. People who lack self-restraint may spend excessive time on the phone without doing exercises. Because their bodies remain inactive all day，they are more vulnerable to diseases, such as obesity and diabetes. Likewise，their eyesight will suffer due to long screen time. Moreover, mobile phones can damage our mental health. Recent researches have shown that people who spend more time on social media have a higher level of stress because they may make unnecessary comparisons based on what they have seen on the internet.
Mobile phones may also put netizens at the risk of personal information leakage. For example, people may provide their personal details, including phone numbers, ID numbers before signing up for a digital account. Once these websites are hacked, personal information is likely to be exposed and individuals’ privacy will be violated.
In conclusion, it is true that smartphones bring convenience to our life, but I disagree with the opinion that the benefits of these phones outweigh the problems because of all the negative effects it has on individuals as well as societies.
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 78
- The charts below show the result of surveys asking undergraduates and postgraduates why they choose Vaster university 78
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life Is this a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61824324324 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11967405901 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7856539177 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250001609124 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762018666702 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622028338348 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126646169774 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040923442267 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.