The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology for outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The main purpose of nuclear weapons is maintaining the whole nations in peace. In addition to this, the nuclear energy, which is used to make nuclear weapons, provides environmental friendly energies. Therefore, this natural resource appears to have more advantages than that of disadvantages. In my opinion, I completely disagree that the benefits are outweighing the disadvantages due to all the potential consequences dealing with nuclear weapons.
In terms of its benefits, nuclear weapons can be used as the peaceful countries. Since most of countries are holding of nuclear weapons, nowadays, we are free from the wars. This is because the whole nations agreed with the usage of nuclear weapons as a declaration of war as the development of military technology. Due to all this restriction, the world is free from wars and as a result, we can live in safe and comfortable countries.
Furthermore, nuclear energies are environmental friendly. These natural energies are derived from the nature, so that those natural resources do not release any toxic emissions like fossil gases. As a result, the environment would not be damaged from the use or extraction of nuclear sources. Therefore, the use of nuclear energies is beneficial for the environment.
Despite all these benefits of nuclear power, it cannot deny that the nuclear energy is the main source to make the nuclear weapon, which is the most powerful and deadliness weapon in the world. Therefore, its consequences can be fatal and vital to the condition of the earth. For example, Fukushima cases in Japan damaged whole Asian Pacific Ocean due to the leakage of nuclear energies by the earthquakes. Even this happens 20 years ago, its consequences are still remaining.
Also, the wasting the left over nuclear energy can be a problem. Even though nuclear power does not release any emissions, it has the leftover wastes and which wastes must handle with caution. The wrong way to handle of this waste can damage the environment or it can create another pocket size of nuclear weapons. Therefore, the consequence of the use of nuclear energies is phenomenal and the damage to the environment is fatal more than it gives the healthy environment.
In conclusion, even though the benefits of those natural resources are environmentally friendly and can be used as the whole world in peace, its damage to the earth is deadliness. As a result, the damage to the environment cannot recover for a long period of time. Therefore, the damages to the earth in the case of potential accidents or the waste issues will be more deadliness than that of environmental friendly.
- The table shows source of student income over a five-year period in the United States. 56
- The chart shows a percentage of live births by age of mother for UK and non-UK born mothers, 2015 73
- One long distance of planes consumes more than a car and it can pollute environment more than cars. Therefore the unnecessary flight such as tourist travelling should be discouraged than limit the car use. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...e used as the peaceful countries. Since most of countries are holding of nuclear weapons, nowaday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 249, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e environment cannot recover for a long period of time. Therefore, the damages to the earth in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'as a result', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231884057971 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.11801242236 0.155533422707 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12215320911 0.0946595960268 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047619047619 0.0501214627716 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0248447204969 0.0437548338989 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130434782609 0.122226691241 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0227743271222 0.0403226058552 56% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90703786133 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0269151138716 0.0326793684256 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136645962733 0.0861772015684 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0248447204969 0.021408717616 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00621118012422 0.011925033212 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2629.0 1933.35771543 136% => OK
No of words: 432.0 316.048096192 137% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08564814815 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.20517956788 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37962962963 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314814814815 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194444444444 0.203846283523 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131944444444 0.137316102897 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90703786133 2.80594681477 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43287037037 0.56093040696 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.9495700014 60.7387585426 77% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0891783567 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7826086957 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6014318193 49.517814964 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.304347826 127.492653851 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7826086957 20.7743622355 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.478260869565 0.814263465372 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 50.2640901771 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.02173913043 1.69124875643 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.539602797266 0.332605444948 162% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134611412028 0.102741220458 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0802495441791 0.0668466124924 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.595214753334 0.534860350844 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142511110044 0.148594505496 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238639762227 0.134430193775 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103119010982 0.0742795772207 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.45745375187 0.324371583561 141% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0837021893411 0.0638462369009 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383664670988 0.228012699653 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531612395856 0.058150111329 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.