Today family members do not eat meals together. Is this a positive or negative trend?
Dining together does not occur among family members in present days. From my perspective, I believe that this is a pernicious phenomenon. Analyzing the minimal merits of saving time and the overwhelming demerits of loosening family bonds and potential health problems would provide valid support for my verdict.
On the one hand, not having meals with other family members can bring a negligible advantage being time-saving. For example, a family gathering meal in Vietnam often takes up much time as it can only present itself once there are full attendances. Besides, there are a host of rituals during the meal, such as wishing each individual has an appetizing repast. As a consequence, eating meals with family would be time-consuming. For these explanations, I think that having repasts on a person’s own might be flexible, convenient, and time-saving.
On the other hand, having meals without the presence of other family members does more harm than good for decreasing the family bonds and taking a toll on people’s health. Initially, regarding loosening family bonds, not eating repasts with family members may contribute to the generation gap. This is mainly since mealtime is the best time for people to confess; thus grasping a better understanding of others. Therefore, not having meals with family means this invaluable time is wasted, and mutual understanding can be curbed. Moreover, without the close supervision of the senior, youngsters can get used to unhealthy diets, such as consuming excessive amounts of fast foods, leading to adverse effects on their health, even fatal diseases, such as cardiovascular illnesses. Thus, I hold a strong belief that not having repasts with family members has two principal drawbacks of decreasing the family bonds and making people’s health go downhill.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, although the lack of dining together among family members is minimally advantageous in terms of saving time, I concur that it is a negative trend for the significant disadvantages of decreasing the family bonds and taking a toll on people’s health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | soodinzsh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 56 | view |
- Cycling is a healthier and environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 89
- The chart below shows changes in exporting goods in a country in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... full attendances. Besides, there are a host of rituals during the meal, such as wis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37313432836 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9806444738 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54328358209 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9883322698 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265384763312 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100639468923 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653652458971 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169228522017 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249756911371 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.