Today, humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Nowadays, more and more human activities destroy the ecosystem. While some ways in which governments can deal with this situation, individual people also can reduce the burden for our environment.
There are several solutions that governments can implement to address the damaging to the environment. On the one hand, governments should enforce the laws to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions, which are produced by daily human activities. For instance, over the last 10 years, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere increased dramatically by some sources such as vehicles, industrialization, and factories. On the other hand, local authorities also have to propose the rules to limit deforestation which is rising quickly in recent years. A quarter of acreage of forests in Vietnam, for example, dropped significantly in just two years from 2012 to 2014.
Besides, individual people should support their governments to mitigate the pressure on our ecosystem. Firstly, they can hold some education and propaganda campaigns to raise awareness for other local inhabitants. Through these activities, they should explain the role of forests, ozone layer to our lives and the detrimental effects of the CO2 which affect not only the atmosphere and fresh air but also to the human respiratory system. Secondly, people can encourage the community to use reusable bags and recycle bottles instead of plastic and nylon which are building up not only on lands but also in oceans. For example, a majority of supermarkets in Vietnam are using bio-degeneration bags to carry goods for customers.
In conclusion, although authorities have the responsibility to resolve the environmental problems, personal human also can help their governments to protect our ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | bibikulsum | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Nguyen Viet Minh Hoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | vida1008 | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | vida1008 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 727, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion bags to carry goods for customers. In conclusion, although authorities have...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47080291971 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13316650976 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1601822292 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.307692308 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213357469327 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823268781599 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909997073576 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148034980784 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409227057491 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.