Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
A topical issue in modern society is the standard of living in urban areas which will decline in the future years. This has caused many difficulties for residents and local councils. This essay will discuss the reasons why this is occurring, and offer some solutions.
There are two main reasons why the quality of people’s lives becomes lower than ever before. Firstly, the large number of people moves countryside to big cities. This is because they can seek more employment opportunities with higher salary and income. As a result, it leads to overpopulation and shortage of houses for inhabitants in large cities. Secondly, the environment is likely to pollute due to air pollution and water pollution. To elaborate, traffic congestion level is increasing in the heart of the city in rush hour with a large number of vehicles. Additionally, residents have to suffer from diseases because they use unsafe water and they live nearby industrial zones where contaminated water include hazardous chemicals is relieved into rivers and lakes every day.
Nonetheless, there are a number of ways to resolve this problem. First of all, the governments should invest money in companies in the countryside to create more jobs for locals. Therefore, they will not have to leave hometown to urban cities. Furthermore, local councils should implement policy and laws to companies which usually get rid of water waste to the environment. To be specific, those companies must set up water waste treatment systems to help protect waterways in the natural.
In conclusion, the standard of living in big cities is a topic which is very relevant to modern society. Nevertheless, I believe that the best way to resolve this issue is by applying policy and laws to companies where water waste level affects the environment seriously. If the authorities do not avoid this problem, residents will have to live under pollution in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Wangdu | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Kcute | 11 | view |
- Many qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to work in specialist areas like engineering and medicine What are the reasons for this trend Can anything be done to discourage this movement 73
- Some people think that classes with fewer students are more beneficial than classes with a large number of students To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past Someone think the changes have been very positive while others believe they have been negative Discuss both these points of view and give your opinion 61
- What can governments do to encourage children to eat more healthily Write at least 250 words to discuss the topic 61
- What can governments do to encourage children to eat more healthily Write at least 250 words to discuss the topic 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...the heart of the city in rush hour with a large number of vehicles. Additionally, residents have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13694267516 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80076122848 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2903605192 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6111111111 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0752838587313 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246239427105 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326611758299 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0421052716957 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320668732635 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.