In todays job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job market may not need any formal qualifications.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Workplace is demanding practical skills over academic education, and the future is set for a high demand for the people with hands on experience. It is highly unlikely that this phenomena will make college education redundant. I believe demand for experienced job will continue to rise but a place for highly educated will always be there.
Firstly, the world population is rising, and demands for all commodities are increasing which requires more factories. In other worlds, this phenomena requires unskilled labours which does not requires high education and can be achieved by on the job training. Furthermore, it is unfeasible for the factories to recruit people with university degree to work as a factory worker, because of their high demand. Therefore, the demand for practically experienced people will probably rise.
Secondly, every experience wants instant impact from their employees. That is to say, people with no experience requires great deal training whereas, that is not the case for the skilled employees. For example, a general university degree does not offer hands on practical experience to its students. As a result, companies prefer to recruit skilled people with practical experience.
Now, we just cannot ignore the fact that the value of academic education is invaluable. Specially, when it comes to high position jobs. For instance, an unskilled people having no formal education cannot fill up the position of chief financial officer which requires extensive knowledge on that particular field of study. However, these types of jobs can only provide hand full of employments, therefore dependency on practical jobs will grow even further.
In conclusion, although jobs opportunities for skilled people at a rise and likely to grow further in the future, but there will always be a place for people with academic education.
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- In todays job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job market may not need any formal qualifications. 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- In todays job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job market may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... experience. It is highly unlikely that this phenomena will make college education r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...quires more factories. In other worlds, this phenomena requires unskilled labours wh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'require'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: require
...quires unskilled labours which does not requires high education and can be achieved by o...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3904109589 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81331812396 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7602808942 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104326964399 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381057992391 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356277703597 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691158191321 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210027835346 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.