Topic: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?

Essay topics:

Topic: Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?

Nowadays, an increasing number of people express concern regarding traffic infrastructure. However, it is a controversial issue that the government should invest in whether railways or roads. In my view, the government needs to pay more attention to railways.

Firstly, it is obvious that railway is one of the essential public transports, which is vastly beneficial to society. It is because that it reduces accidents, traffic situation as well as improve resident's health and environment. Therefore, the government should give top priority to build and develop railways system.

Moreover, it plays an important role in improving people's living conditions. To illustrate, countries that have modern traffic system also have an advanced economy, which can be named as Japan, Korea and so on. These countries used to have a similar situation as Viet Nam but now they became developed countries of the world.

That is not to say that the government should not spend money on roads. They also are important parts of traffic system, which are necessary for people to take transports. Nevertheless, advantages of roads are far from these of railways.

In conclusion, the government should focus on public transport, especially railways. Meanwhile, they should not ignore the roads system. Improving traffic system is one of the best ways to help countries to boost their development.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-16 behiraha 78 view
2019-12-05 nikhil salwan 67 view
2019-12-04 asdfgzxcvb 78 view
2019-10-03 Baljinder Singh 1985 84 view
2019-09-23 andrew123 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
.... Meanwhile, they should not ignore the roads system. Improving traffic system is one...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41013824885 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96247063126 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585253456221 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6907558395 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.2666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4666666667 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133128989706 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059095103747 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937554157118 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845627665726 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481281138409 0.056905535591 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.