Topic: Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
Ages of leaders and directors have been a great concern at workplaces nowadays since it is thought that older leaders should be replaced by younger ones in this fast-moving industrialized society. I do strongly believe that contention makes sense for the following reasons.
There are numerous motives why young generations should be a better fit for the position. First of all, the well-qualified degrees and updated professional knowledge that university or college graduates accumulated would be extremely necessary for their job. In fact, they are equipped with technological skills and soft-skills such as leadership, group-working, communicative and management skills. Therefore, it is easier for them to manage and guide their employees to achieve significant business goals. Moreover, leaders and managers are those who have to work under high pressure with great workloads. Consequently, only their mental and physical health be at good stages can they overcome those challenges; therefore, young and fresh generations are exactly a good choice for the management position.
Admittedly, it could have been said that older leaders or directors are no longer suitable in the current challenging industry. Their old-fashioned working style would be an example worth mentioning. In order to get a task done, the elder co-workers have to go through many unnecessary processes including the red tape, which consumes a great amount of time rather than their younger counterparts do. One more thing is that the elderly have to face up many health-related problems which prevent them from going to work regularly and performing themselves perfectly at work. It could slow down the working process and affect the expected outcome of their company.
From all the above-mentioned, the current industry is changing its leaders from the older to younger ones because of their greatest potentials. Universities should invest in their students and equip them with the latest professional knowledge to transform them into sought-after directors after graduating.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | Ixtiyor jalolov.7777 | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | PennybooomC4 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | akbarf | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 78
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 85
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 48
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 73
- Topic: Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58146964856 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08312503049 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2375406188 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.466666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170767404007 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05763379175 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569365521337 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114911594963 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488284827125 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.