When it comes to getting admissions in universities, some people subscribe to this belief that only young pupils with high credentials should be offered places whereas others deem that students with lower marks should be given places without any age restriction. Although giving admissions to high grade students makes the universities well-reputed, I personally believe that a chance is given to students with less percentage considering their circumstances.
On the one hand, given the reputation of universities, it is highly imperative if pupils who obtain high percentage at younger age are occupied. The more the high intellectuals, the more the tertiary level universities become prestigious. Moreover, when the students with high mental abilities get the chance studying in these well-renowned universities, their chances of getting employed are more since employment sectors need the young minds. Research revealed that 50% of graduates, studied from the Queens university, are selected in retail sector.
On the other hand, it is considered by many that there ought to not any age and marks restriction in order to study in universities. In other words, owing to some circumstances as well as happenings, few people could not concentrate on studies as a result of which they obtain low marks. In addition, due to finacial crisis, some pupils take a gap year to earn a handsome amount of money so that they get admissions for further studies. In a number of instances, it can be seen that children who usually get lower marks in academic studies; however, they are considered to be more creative and always excel in their job duties. Therefore, universities had better not consider age and marks.
In conclusion, while selecting high-graded younger students gives universities high reputation, I believe that it is high time gave low-ranked students of all ages an opportunity to hone their skills and excel in job sector.
- Some people say that children no longer need to develop handwriting skills others believe that handwriting is still important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 52
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 89
- Topic: Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks, others say that they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 78
- The number of older people is increasing. Some people think it will cause the problem to their countries, others believe this group is important to society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Most people take interviews to elect a person for job. What are the other ways? What do you think is the best way to recruiters new employees? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that 50% of graduates, studied from the Queens university, are selected in retai...
^^
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hey get admissions for further studies. In a number of instances, it can be seen t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30844155844 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04068625411 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561688311688 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3305722203 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231379891986 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800972966577 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574642291034 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142509842007 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568540692653 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.