It is widely stated that a vast majority of people prefer purchasing items in sought-after brands rather than others. This is because of their reliability and compatible products for many customers. I believe that this improvement positively impacts on individuals and society as a whole.
Firstly, there is no room for doubt that well-known brands attract an enormous number of customers due to their long-term fame in the global market. With strong financial resources, their production chains are completely outstanding compared to their counterparts, leading to high-quality items, and therefore are favored by many people. On top of that, understanding personal preferences is a major success of these famous companies to gain customer’s trust. Consequently, their products are suitable for all ages, with reasonably affordable prices for any financial background. Taking Nike as a prime example, a sought-after sports brand that provides a host of top-notch and affordable running shoes to those who live with a decent income.
This huge achievement of these industries beneficially affects people in many aspects. First of all, it is fairly economical for those with a decent budget to purchase necessary items at a reasonable price. Additionally, famous brands can greatly boost one’s economic hub of a region, not to mention a country thanks to its large selling. Furthermore, this attracts many international investments from global companies and results in job opportunities for countless people. For instance, it is recorded that Samsung, which is famous for technological devices, has created a diversity of jobs for many people in Korea since 2018.
In conclusion, due to two main reasons, customers favor these well-known companies over others to receive better services. And this hugely benefits not only an individual but also a community.
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- the flow chart below show the procedure to get the driving license in US 73
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53846153846 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1095929306 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63986013986 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5295980874 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111561106487 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374955078236 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273698676949 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653126185439 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257496502698 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.