The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
Nowadays, members, who are in a family, do not usually spend time to have traditional meals together because adults have to face the fast pace of life and the younger members have a massive amount of homework. It massively impacts the distance between family members.
To begin with, regarding the eldier members, they have to live their family. Therefore, they usually spend most of their time to work hard. Their amount of time they send to have meals with other members, thus, is shorter. Moreover, regarding the younger ones, their responsibilities are hard-learning thanks to being an A-students in their class or getting a well-qualified contification at universities or colleges. For example, in Vietnam, if a student want to earn respect and have their parents’ attention, the only way that student can do is being an A-student or getting a qualified contification at the famous university. As a result, the time members consume in having traditional meals together is shorter every day.
Therefore, impacts on family members’ relationship is massive. Firstly, regarding the relationship between children and their parents, children cannot usually share with their parents their school stories because their parents are lost their energy at their workplace. Therefore, the relationship between them is longer and parents cannot connect with their children if their children are in hazardous circumstances. Moreover, children are needed to help to distinguish the right or the wrong. Therefore, parents have responsibilities to direct them onto the right path. Due to the relationship of them is longer, it is difficult for parents to help them clarify the right path.
To sum up, traditional meals are important not only for the relationship between each family members, but also for the children’s growing up procress. Parents, hence, need to pay attention to their children and the younger members should spend more time to share their stories with older ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 67
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 61
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35256410256 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94862736762 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.836675895 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0877801637764 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042840443956 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534019286831 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707029614123 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374903809977 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.