The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
Nowadays, members, who are in a family, do not usually spend time to have traditional meals together so family meals are gradually disappearing because adults have to face the fast pace of life and the younger members have a massive amount of homework. It massively impacts the distance between family members.
To begin with, regarding the eldier members, they have to live their family. Therefore, they usually spend most of their time to work hard. Their amount of time they send to have meals with other members, thus, is shorter. Moreover, regarding the younger ones, their responsibilities are hard-learning thanks to being an A-students in their class or getting a well-qualified contification at universities or colleges. For example, in Vietnam, if a student want to earn respect and have their parents’ attention, the only way that student can do is being an A-student or getting a qualified contification at the famous university. As a result, the time members consume in having traditional meals together is shorter every day.
Therefore, impacts on family members’ relationship is massive. Firstly, regarding the relationship between children and their parents, children cannot usually share with their parents their school stories because their parents are lost their energy at their workplace. Therefore, the relationship between them is longer and parents cannot connect with their children if their children are in hazardous circumstances. Moreover, children are needed to help to distinguish the right or the wrong. Therefore, parents have responsibilities to direct them onto the right path. Due to the relationship of them is longer, it is difficult for parents to help them clarify the right path.
To sum up, traditional meals are important not only for the relationship between each family members, but also for the children’s growing up procress. Parents, hence, need to pay attention to their children and the younger members should spend more time to share their stories with older ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 67
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country rather than the literature and history of other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3679245283 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96076989646 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471698113208 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7592264084 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106239317553 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477179942392 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599513622487 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874262317264 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638946781797 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.