The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
In this day and age, it is evident that there is an increasing disinterest in the practice of having meals with family. This essay discusses some remarkable reasons and their effects.
There are two chief factors responsible for the disappearance of the family meals. Firstly, this issue is attributed to adult’s excessive concentration on work. Nowadays, people, particularly parents tend to be more assiduous hoping to get more money. Their schedules do seem not to consist of mealtimes with their beloved ones. Moreover, they usually eat out with their co-workers, clients, and even skip their lunch and dinner. Furthermore, the emergence of food apps offering hundreds of choices allows people to pick their preferred dishes shortly without wasting time cooking deliberately. Therefore, family mealtimes become less crucial to them.
Some fundamental influences could be anticipated. First, if this trend continues, close-knit families will gradually become distant, children and parents would be less close and the family bonding could deteriorate. Besides, getting inadequate concerns from parents can cause kid’s misconduct and even society vices. In addition, if people abuse the apps and eat a lot of ordered food, they could consume redundant unhealthy food and do not have a balanced diet. This could lead to some detrimental health conditions relating to cardiovascular disease and obesity.
In conclusion, the disappearance of family mealtimes stems from overloaded work and the convenience of technology in the hustle life. This situation could lead to unwanted impacts on family affection, children, and their health as well.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-10 | trần ngọc tuấn | 78 | view |
2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 89 | view |
2023-08-31 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
2022-03-05 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 73 | view |
2022-01-13 | Huy Vu | 73 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 89
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subject What are causes And what will be effects on society 84
- The range and quality of food that we can buy has changed because of technological and scientific advances Some people regard this change as an improvement while others believe that it is harmful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, even so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45149253731 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84045918793 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638059701493 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7493247551 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9411764706 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124177581684 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384241005678 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317271074353 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772060226272 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197212419382 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.