The map above illustrates how the road access to a city hospital in 2007 is transformed in 2010. Generally, the significant difference is seen on the center part of the map meanwhile the north and south side remains the same.
The changes made to the access are mainly on the hospital road surroundings. First of all, the ends of the hospital road are now turned into circles which previously were three junctions. Furthermore, the bus stop from the far east of the map is moved to the left of the hospital road. In addition, the car parking for staff is located on the direct opposite. The parking for the public car is now separated from the staff’s and occupies the east side of the hospital along the ring road.
However, the road access is not completely changed. This is depicted with the same display of the north and south side of the map. On the north, the city hospital is still surrounded by the ring road. Meanwhile, there is still a city road on the south.
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 52
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- IELTS WRITING TASK 1 TEST 4 CAMBRIDGE 16 ACADEMIC The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 1.0 24.0651302605 4% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 176.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55681818182 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48858447434 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 176.041082164 50% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 506.74238477 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2048509798 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.9090909091 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25060175742 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111323808683 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867014475106 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18017519914 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027015413454 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.0946893788 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.