Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a fat tax is unfair and unnecessary Discuss both these views and give

Essay topics:

Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live. Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a ‘fat tax’ is unfair and unnecessary.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is argued that unhealthy eating leads to a negative impact on individuals and society as a whole. Some people suggest that the government should tax unhealthy foods. While others believe that it's unfair and unnecessary to impose fat taxes. In this essay, I will discuss these views and give some reasons why unhealthy foods should be taxed.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why people think that imposing a fat tax is the necessary thing that government should do to protect people's health. Firstly, imposing a fat tax can help people avoid a lot of diseases such as blood pressure or stomachache. Secondly, if unhealthy food is taxed, there will be fewer people buying these unhealthy foods and they only buy healthy foods. This will encourage people to eat more healthy foods. For example, people will decide to buy fresh potatoes instead of french fries if they are overpriced. Hence imposing a fat tax is the best way to limit eating unhealthy food.

On the other hand, I believe that imposing a "fat tax" is unfair and unnecessary. To begin with, imposing a fat tax can make people have a difficult decision to eat because some people think that unhealthy food is the only affordable meal and the healthy meal have to spend a lot of money for them. In addition, if imposing the fat tax, some people will not eat their favorite food such as soft drinks or sweets. This will make them feel uncomfortable and unfulfilled with their food needs. For instance, children tend to eat unhealthy food such as sweets, if taxing this unhealthy food, their food requests will not be met. Overall, these are the reasons why taxing unhealthy food is not necessary for some people.

In conclusion, although taxing unhealthy food will protect people's health, it seems to me that imposing a fat tax is unfair and unnecessary for some people

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-08 dorae 78 view
Essays by user dorae :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...of french fries if they are overpriced. Hence imposing a fat tax is the best way to l...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the other hand, I believe that imposing a 'fat tax' is unfair and unnec...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84012539185 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47859519185 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.429056786 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8235294118 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466937394016 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183790820918 0.084324248473 218% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804348750811 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357838246142 0.151304729494 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100567854632 0.056905535591 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.