In these days, there is not strict separation between man and women, men doing every kind a job also women doing, too. The sharp separation of job is turning to ashes. There are so many samples including this situation nowadays. For instance females can be taxi driver, males can be babysitter. I do not accept that idea which every gender can do every kind of job.
Firstly, each gender can not afford work requirement, totally. For instance, in a factory which producing heavy industrial material under extreme conditions where is not proper for female. Both gender have different nature come in from birth. Universities should not accept equal amount from both gender because there are natural differences between males and females. They are not same for this reason their department might be dissimilar.
Secondly, interest of each gender is different,basically. %70 of men want to be a pilot but only %20 of women want to be pilot. So if quota of department split in two, this create unjustice placement to university. Accepting equal number of students from both gender interrupt these rate of interest about mentioned job. In addition to this fulfilling the job requirement and rate of success is not similar for each gender. Men are more suitable for being a soldier than woman also woman is more suitable being a nurse.
In conclusion, accepting equal male and female student is not helpful for preferring of their department. Both gender can not cope with every sort of job, same. For these reasons, I definitely disagree accepting equal students from each gender. This makes unbalance in society.
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 100
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to work'
Suggestion: to work
... Firstly, each gender can not afford work requirement, totally. For instance, in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...e is not proper for female. Both gender have different nature come in from birth. Un...
^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , basically
...ly, interest of each gender is different,basically. %70 of men want to be a pilot but onl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...est about mentioned job. In addition to this fulfilling the job requirement and rate...
^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uitable being a nurse. In conclusion, accepting equal male and female student ...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ender. This makes unbalance in society.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05617977528 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70868093451 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558052434457 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5067915825 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.5 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.35 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185151620847 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057792538923 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833996253231 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12858218472 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070072210644 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.