Universities should accept an equal number of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Fewer people opine that universities ought to allow similar proportions of boys and girls in all the courses, I cannot entirely agree with this notion because, if this concept is implemented, it would diminish the opportunities for talented students and also decrease the quality of education.
Firstly, the idea of choosing students merely based on gender during campus admissions is entirely illogical. For instance, In order to divide the limited seats to male and female applicants, authorities of the institution tend to overlook and disregard the qualities and passion of the students who are crucial for the students' career. As a result, underserved and uninterested candidates are allowed to take the admission in the place of passionate students which eventually leads to poor overall academic performance.
Moreover, few professions are preferred and are apt for particular gendered individuals. For example, careers such as pilot, mechanical engineering are preferred more by male students, whereas nursing, dentistry is opted majorly by females. This does not mean any injustice or gender discrimination but is solely based on their dexterity. This pattern of studies encourages them to outperform in their academics because they choose their careers out of passion but not by choice. Furthermore, this policy may persuade a shortage of qualified workers in societies. Because man graduated in nursing courses will not work as a woman who could serve more efficiently.
To conclude, after analysing the hindrances of implementing the concept of allowing equal boys and girls in universities subjects, it is unwise to follow such a proposal as it might dilute the quality of education. Therefore, universities should focus on the passions, merits and skills of the students to encourage them and provide an adequate education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Nihad | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | tatadaigia | 22 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | Stephen Halolo | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | kamalcalc1977 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | kamalcalc1977 | 78 | view |
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
- IELTS writing task 1 the recycling process of plastics 61
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 565, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tage of qualified workers in societies. Because man graduated in nursing courses will n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52464788732 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04807370691 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5772300619 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126266402483 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401212696801 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465628463574 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790407729832 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454844380819 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.