Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject.Do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, the disappearance of prejudices against gender roles has given equal educational opportunities for both men and women. However, I disagree with the view that the number of male and female should be equal in every subject.
It is true that it is just simply unrealistic when it comes to equal numbers of men and women in every degree. Each gender their own intrinsic characteristics for different subjects. In fact, men usually have an aptitude for science-related subjects while the opposite gender is associated with art subjects or linguistics. This means that if the educational institution accepted the same number of both genders in physics classes, the likelihood of girls lagging behind boys in academic achievements is inevitable.
However, it is proved to be unfair to base admission to university courses on gender. In fact, the post-secondary institutions should select students based on their academic attainments and their potential skills required for that subject. This method of admission means that every gender could follow any subject based on their personal preferences without the restriction of candidate numbers. For instance, The professionals could not reject the girl with outstanding competence for linguistics and good communication skill and accept the boy with lower ability just in order to guarantee the equal numbers in the class.
In conclusion, I believe that universities should accept students based on their potential skills and academic achievements. Equal numbers of male and female in one specific discipline could act as a deterrent for either men or women from making progress.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-07 | grahamoneil | 56 | view |
| 2015-07-24 | samsid | 80 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change job. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 61
- the pie chart shows the percentages of expenditure on different items in USA 56
- In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1396.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47450980392 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07048055304 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6402416206 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263903598038 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108003916984 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111173375705 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19212006346 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698660284742 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.