Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In recent decade, equal number of male and female students in every subject has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this suggestion appears attractive, the disadvantages will be also significant.
The universities should not allow same number of men and women in every subject in some cases. First, since every subject need to equal number of male and female, they could have to apply for some course that they are not a strength point in this subject. In fact, if women study some subjects such as mathematic or programming, they would not solve problems as fast as possible like men, which lead to a lower performance in study, making them to give up these subjects. Second, by arranging equal number male and female students, some subjects has a small number of people who apply for these subjects. This means that some subjects like history may have 2 or 3 students, which result in an expensive cost to active these courses for facilities and staffs such as classroom, electricity and teacher.
There are some reasons why universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. First, in order to make a good atmosphere in classroom, balancing number men and women in the classroom is necessary. For instance, male or female would not feel alone in lieu of talking with other gender, which could lead to better scores and performance than before. Second, if there are same number between male and female in every subject, teacher can easily to give assignments. Plenty of evidence suggests that teacher can give balance level for both genders which allow them to clearly abilities each students without genders.
In conclusion, each situation has double face, thus people could not say which one is the best. However, by considering all pros and cons, the universities can make the best decisions.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparis 84
- The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should spend about 40 m 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as possible 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... not solve problems as fast as possible like men, which lead to a lower performance ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... and female students, some subjects has a small number of people who apply for these subjects. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... In conclusion, each situation has double face, thus people could not say w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04193548387 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57017229772 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525806451613 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.752213072 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301769100158 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129874585849 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141873670411 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179003203031 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939704061419 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.