The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?.
In this contemporary, due to advancement in transportion, cars have become first choice for people's daily use. This over use have resulted in elevation of numerous problems. However, I believe people should be encouraged to use less cars. Here, these issues will be scrutinised in upcoming sections.
To commence with, excessive use of cars has led to number of problems. First of all, it is primary cause of air pollution in most of countries. It is rising the level of carbon dioxide, which is resulting in global warming, therefore temperature of earth has risen by few degrees in recent years. Effecting all forms of life, and changing crop patterns in few nations. For instance, in India summers are more drier and hotter, that has adverse effect on wildlife and agriculture. Moreover, it has reduced physical activity, thus health of modern people have deteriorated. Individuals are more dependent on cars, even for short distances, so problems like cardiac arrests, higher cholesterol and obesity. Hence, there are multifarious issues of this phenomenon.
Nevertheless, despite of its merits it is mandatory to discourage people from its use. Firstly, it will be beneficial for health, people can use other renewable sources such as cycle and bio fuel, preserving natural Reserves of coal and petroleum. People can prevent number of diseases and can lead a healthy life. Furthermore, quality of air will be improved which means it can be solution to sever global issue. To illustrate, in several nations electric transport is used, that is decreasing pollution level in that particular area. Deducing, preventing people to use cars can be advantageous for both humans and natural surroundings.
In conclusion, more utilization of any this has many repercussion, thus it can dangerous in various aspects. And, to promote other public transports to discourage people from use can be helpful.
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase in globalisation produce positive effects for everyone Do you agree or disagree 89
- Nuclear energy is a better source of power for today global energy needs To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 78
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?. 78
- Research are essential for developing new medicines and treatment to get better health and less disease Who individual private companies or government should fund these researches 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ieve people should be encouraged to use less cars. Here, these issues will be scruti...
^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...it is primary cause of air pollution in most of countries. It is rising the level of carbon dioxi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'drier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: drier
...ons. For instance, in India summers are more drier and hotter, that has adverse effect on ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun repercussion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many repercussions'.
Suggestion: many repercussions
...usion, more utilization of any this has many repercussion, thus it can dangerous in various aspec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29702970297 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95116316149 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610561056106 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6986531681 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.25 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.15 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247049182606 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725004152295 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783450220734 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150401756307 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468291695746 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.