The increasing prevalence of social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter has undoubtedly transformed the way people communicate and connect with others. While some may argue that the replacement of face-to-face contact with online interactions has its drawbacks, the advantages of this development are of greater significance.
The virtual nature of social media can lead to a sense of isolation and superficiality in relationships. Face-to-face contact allows for genuine emotional connections, non-verbal cues, and deeper understanding, which are often lost in online interactions. This can result in a decline in meaningful interpersonal relationships and a sense of detachment from others. Nevertheless, I believe that this negative effect can be mitigated if individuals try to strike a balance between virtual and physical communication, which is crucial to maintaining healthy relationships, mental well-being, and a sense of community.
If used appropriately, social media offers numerous advantages related to connectivity and the availability of information. Firstly, it provides a means of connecting with friends, family, and acquaintances regardless of geographical distances. People who live far from each other can easily stay in touch, share updates, and engage in conversations with others, fostering social connections that may not have been feasible without such platforms. Concerning the other benefit, social media enhances access to information and knowledge-sharing. Platforms like Twitter serve as sources of news and real-time updates, allowing individuals to stay informed about current events worldwide.
In conclusion, although the abuse of social media may not provide some users with the depth and authenticity that face-to-face communication offers, these platforms serve as a powerful tool that enriches social relationships, especially long distance ones, and facilitates knowledge exchange. When individuals learn how to use social media mindfully, I believe that this development is generally more advantageous.
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- Task 2 Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06849315068 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51405242685 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.820697954 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.307692308 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29932017393 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100426789787 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756602939955 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190930691676 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822182431618 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06849315068 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51405242685 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609589041096 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.820697954 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.307692308 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29932017393 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100426789787 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756602939955 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190930691676 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822182431618 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.