The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction between many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, there has been a gradual shift towards interaction via social networking sites, which has had a substitute for in-person communication. This essay agrees that the benefits of this phenomenon are overshadowed by its drawbacks.
Admittedly, there is no doubt that social media platforms can offer certain undeniable merits. One of the most obvious advantages is that this means of communication can facilitate supportive relationships. Indeed, social media gives users a chance of connecting without geographical barriers, so much so that they can interact with their relatives straightforwardly and conveniently. As a result, these online users can well maintain frequent contact with significant friends and family members even when they are in different locations via video calls in real-time provided, with a simple click of a button.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, I firmly believe that online communication does more harm than good. Firstly, digital platforms which do not engage in face-to-face meetings might isolate people from communities and discourage personal interactions. When people spend too much time on social media, they can be addicted to it and then lose interest in desiring to have an actual conversation. No doubt, this phenomenon can not only decline interpersonal communication skills but also exert a detrimental effect on their mental health such as depression and loneliness since they become increasingly reliant on social media and consider them a primary mode of communication. Second, communicating via social platforms could deteriorate positive relationships. Social media can be a significant hindrance to social-emotional connections since it does not allow users to fully express personal emotions and feelings with simple text messages. Consequently, digital platform usage might lead to satisfaction in relationships, which increases the likelihood of misunderstandings or conflicts among users.
In conclusion, due to the above-mentioned reasons, I am of the opinion that the upsides of online interaction are outshined by its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- The map below shows a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 73
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...social networking sites, which has had a substitute for in-person communication. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82258064516 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44015130466 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638709677419 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7758061453 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152959039519 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509633258068 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487756463098 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755808108589 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443382792346 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...social networking sites, which has had a substitute for in-person communication. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, well, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82258064516 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44015130466 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638709677419 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7758061453 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152959039519 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509633258068 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487756463098 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755808108589 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443382792346 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.