The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

In this day and age, social media is becoming so ubiquitous that people view it as the substitute for real-life interactions. From my personal perspective, while this trend has several benefits, I believe that the downsides of this phenomenon overcomes the advantages.
On the one hand, the new state of technology has affected the way humans socialized negatively. To begin with, people nowadays are getting overly dependent on social networks and the internet, which can provide them with as much information as they need. Consequently, this may cause addiction, mental illness and lack of interpersonal skills. Therefore, people can be reluctant to communicate with others by overusing those social platforms. Secondly, social media usage may reduce emotional connection. For example, many people pay too much attention to notifications on social media apps such as Facebook or Instagram rather than talking with their friends sitting next to them. Thus, people may become less emotional as well as lose a sense of communication.
On the other hand, the internet has a variety of pros. People can easily access their community or relevant information at fingertips. Furthermore, global citizens can be connected with others on the internet and social platforms such as Facebook and Skype, and learn more about other cultures and foreign languages by communicating via those apps.
To sum up, social media is advantageous for people all over the world. However, the pros are outweighed by the cons of lack face-to-face interactions.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nowadays are getting overly dependent on social networks and the internet, which ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39004149378 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00021520896 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634854771784 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8222497421 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2142857143 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192678164431 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682872031167 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643020137918 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131900590322 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104519838896 0.056905535591 184% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.