Using advanced technology in agriculture, such as chemical fertilisers and machinery, has resulted in producing more food. Some people, however, think these technologies have negative effects.
In recent years, a boon to the invention of high-tech machinery devices and powerful chemical compounds such as pesticides and fertilizers, farming has witnessed a great boom. However, some people believe these facilities lead to an increase in food production and quality, it is noteworthy that there could be some drawbacks besides the advantages of these chemicals and farming machines.
On the one hand, it is eloquent to everyone that without the help of technology and chemistry, attaining the high quality and amount of food products may be difficult. Decline in the soil power is an inevitable event which not only affects the quality of the crops during the time, but it plunges the farmers’ profit from the products sell by decreasing in harvested products. For instance, although in the past era tomato was growing in 20 days with the average weight of 50 grams approximately, these days it plunged to 10days with a mean weight of 150 grams. Another merit for recently developed farming devices is the speed of planting and harvesting. Recent statistics have shown that rice planting speed has increased to 100 crops per minute, however, it would be at last 10 pieces per minute manually. So, thanks to recent technology development in the agriculture field, it is acceptable to use high-tech machinery and chemicals in order to make an improvement in this industry.
On the other hand, despites the advantages of using technology in farming, drawbacks are inevitable. Joblessness is the utmost important disadvantage of machines entry in the farms. A good illustration for this is the machinery revolution in developing countries which has affected the workers’ employment at farms that leads to workers eradicating by burgeoning modern farming machines. Also, impacts of fertilizers’ overusing on humans genetic is a controversial issue which has been proven by food and drug administration. Therefore, recent scientific analysis has proven the negative effect of farming chemicals on mice fertilizing rate and babies’ health that leads to 30% more mentally harmed than normal ones.
In conclusion, entrance of technological farming methods in this field, increase the productivity and speed up the farming but harms the employment and humans genetic. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that chemical and machinery developments merits outweigh the demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-22 | naghmehaghakhani | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | alirezabp | 84 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. 73
- Some people believe the society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. However, others argue that there are still some advantages of adverts. 84
- The government is responsible for protecting a nation s culture identity Some people believe the government should make sure that new buildings are built in a traditional style To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- It seems that we have turned into a "throw-away" culture, as we are filling up our environment with so many plastic bags and rubbish.Why do you think this has happened? What measures can you recommend for reducing this problem? 78
- Today, a majority of children are raised by their grandparents due to the fact that their parents are busy working. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43548387097 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11182591346 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6661068666 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.8 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163534579613 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522156639252 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04844500456 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101372103015 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344995645531 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.