We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Someone believe that we are not able to help everyone all over the world, so we only need to spend our money and capacity help our own communities and countries. I do not agree with this idea because in my view, we should try to help as many people as possible.
On the first hand, I admit that we need help our neighbours and fellow citizens first. In many places surrounding us, we can see may people who has disadvantages in some way. Those can be an abandoned child in street, the disabled who cannot make ends meet by themselves. We all have opportunities to volunteer time or give money to support these people. For example, in my local, there are many activists who serve free meals for homeless people every weekend. As the problems are on our doorstep, I can understand why some people think that we should prioritize local charity.
At the same time, I believe that humanity should not limited by national borders. We are all human kinds and have obligation to try our best to support people who need help wherever they live. In some countries, the problems that people face are much more serious and there are variety ways to help. For instance, when children are dying diseases in a poor country, governments and individuals in developed countries can save lives by sharing vaccines cost or donate for doctors and activists. With some global problems, such as diseases, pollution, helping people in those under-developed countries is effective way to keep ourselves from similar obstacles. A small donation to international charity might have a much greater than helping in our local area.
In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help everyone, but national boundaries should not stop us from helping those who are in need.
- We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services. 61
- The table gives information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cities in the same week in May 2017 74
- The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008 59
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
Someone believe that we are not able to help everyone a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
Someone believe that we are not able to help everyone a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
...ople who has disadvantages in some way. Those can be an abandoned child in street, the di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'limit'
Suggestion: limit
...ime, I believe that humanity should not limited by national borders. We are all human k...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country, governments and individuals in developed countries can save lives by sh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65764097567 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7097674845 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368539322077 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1224727648 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109079863822 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264223872842 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150791859582 0.056905535591 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.