Wealthy countries should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Wealthy countries should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that developing countries should be provided humanitarian assistance during the natural calamities. This essay agrees with this statement because the developed countries are morally obliged to do so and they can afford to help poor nations during such disasters.

It is a moral obligation for a wealthy nation to provide assistance to the wretched countries in case of natural disasters. Firstly, it can help build relations between the two and aiding the latter to grow positively. Secondly, it is an act of humanity that helps build the world to be a better place to live in. Recent searches prove that the prosperous countries with moral ethics offering a helping hand to the poorer ones, help build a stronger society, a place where people can trust each other and restore faith in humanity.

In addition, being an affluent country, they can easily afford to provide the necessities to these disaster-stuck nations. The money which can be provided can be used to fix the destruction caused by calamity. These means can also be used to provide needs like food and shelter to the suffering people. This may give them a sigh of relief. For instance, America helped Israel a long time ago when there was an earthquake that had destroyed the country. America provided financial aids and assisted the country in their hour of need.

In conclusion, the suffering nations should be assisted by globalized countries during the natural catastrophe as they are not only morally responsible to bridge the gap between the nations but also can aid financially. It is high time for all the nations to realize this fact.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-14 qwe12050 61 view
2018-09-03 Deepali Chopra 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h other and restore faith in humanity. In addition, being an affluent country, ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted the country in their hour of need. In conclusion, the suffering nations sho...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00367647059 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70374106052 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566176470588 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2077102772 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249676417243 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906989196174 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111247701959 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175489743069 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114922568187 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.