Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.
Do you agree or disagree?
Humanitarian aid should be provided by developed countries when natural catastrophes occur. I agree, the reasons being that developed nations have adequate finance and may require help from others in the future. Here are the beliefs.
One reason why countries with better finance are obliged to help is the amount of money they have. By that, they are able to afford, hence purchase advanced equipment, such as cutting-edge technology which could bring a huge impact. They can also set up certain foundations and organizations, which give resources to the ones that are in need. Research shows that in poorer places, over half of the individuals are starving, wondering whether they could find their next meal. In fact, some would eat dirt, because of the necessity unfulfilled. By helping them, this could be beneficial as the people in poverty might not have the ability and therefore could possibly improve their chances of survival.
Another reason why richer nations should lend a helping hand to poorer ones is that they may find themselves in a similar situation as anything is possible, as no one can foresee the future. a massive earthquake may hit and shake all the citizens, destroying almost everything, and go from owning everything to having nothing within seconds. For instance, the Fukushima incident, where a tsunami struck Japan in 2011. In that case, they would need people to help them instead, as they have to rebuild various things, from their residential areas to more. If they helped another country in the past, there’s a higher chance that they would return the favor.
To conclude, rich nations are required to send help to countries that have financial problems, because they have enough affordance and also they may need other countries to help them in time to come.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-23 | bellawuyun | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-19 | MJ Yand | 89 | view |
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 77
- Some say that in today s world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth producing careers such as medicine Discuss whether you think there is a role in today s changing world for study of the humanities 84
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Many people continue to smoke, despite the well-known health risks. Why do people smoke, and how can the amount of smoking be reduced? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ight not have the ability and therefore could possibly improve their chances of survival. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ible, as no one can foresee the future. a massive earthquake may hit and shake al...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12457912458 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59962315784 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8655274744 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.466666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921141356953 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339619325395 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488564807164 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716287966263 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351985021419 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.