As well as making money, business should also have social responsibilities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people hold strong belief that enterprises should embrace their social responsibilities to make a contribution to the general public in addition to gaining profits. I personally agree with this statement, without such social responsibilities, many businesses can cause harm to not only the whole community but also lead to environmental depletion.
On the one hand, it is of great importance for an enterprise to gain economic benefits to survive in today’s competitive markets. Firstly, the primary objective of any firm is to maximize profits. This is exemplified by the fact that a firm should cover its day to day running costs consisting of its monthly electricity bill, staff salaries and other necessary expenses, which makes up for the total revenue a company yields. On top of making profits to cover its basic expenses, an enterprise should also reinvest the total revenue back into the whole organization, not only generating a big motivation to push their staff to work harder to achieve the desired aims but also enticing more well-qualified employees. One standout example originates from the fact that Vingroup, a flourishing Vietnamese corporation often allocates a large amount of financial resources to several local charities, educational programs and promotion campaigns to make a significant contribution to the whole society, alluring numerous high-quality workers.
On the other hand, there are several compelling reasons why many businesses should bear some civic duties on top of making great profits. The chief justification for this statement is that they would raise more awareness about curbing some detrimental impacts on the environment, and cooperate with the local residents to preserve the environment in the long run. Moreover, by contributing to the community, it not only helps a firm promote its brand image to the public but also further develops their annual sales. Donating to local charities,offering more job opportunities and organizing educational programs might be significantly contributory to the whole community to some extent, which makes an enterprise reap some handsome benefits in both fulfilling civic responsibilities and boosting their image to the public.
In conclusion, I strongly advocate the idea that many businesses should take social responsibilities into consideration to fulfill their civic duties and be accountable to the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-08-21 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | maidiem1508 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ibilities to make a contribution to the general public in addition to gaining profits. I perso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... agree with this statement, without such social responsibilities, many businesses...
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er develops their annual sales. Donating to local charities,offering more job opp...
^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , offering
...nual sales. Donating to local charities,offering more job opportunities and organizing e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59673024523 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26358637057 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558583106267 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1445191651 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.166666667 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5833333333 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186257280933 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669258027933 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540159455603 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130328626113 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430560531847 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 13.0946893788 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.