In the backcloth of the digitalized world, the Internet plays a pivotal role in human civilization. It has revolutionized the people's method of living and working. In this essay, I would like to give the Internet a credit as well as depict its negative aspect.
Flashing back to two decades ago, people had just a few ways to communicate with relatives in remote areas. At that time, telephone and letter were the most optimal methods because cell phones are quite exorbitant. However, those are time-consuming and pretty pricey to whom make ends meet. Nowadays, thanks to the Internet, humans can keep in touch with friends all over the world. For instance, only with a low-priced smartphone connected to the Internet, youngsters can easily have a chat or make a phone call to others swiftly regardless of wherever they are.
Besides, the Internet has changed the way we work. In the last few years, most of the workers need to commute to the workshop. This approach contains risks of wasting time as well as being late due to traffic jams, broken cars and so on,....But with the advent of a global connecting system, employees now can choose to work as freelancers. For example, the workers who home are far away from the office entitled to finish their projects from home and email them to the boss. It is not only economical but also contributes to decline the global warming.
On the other hand, since the appearance of this technology, our society is put a strain on confronting cybercrime. Every day, we effortlessly read news about personal's banking account data stolen by hackers which stem from loose IT's security. To safeguard users' information, the government should implement some legislations that can enhance the protection of any transactions.
All in all, the Internet pros outweigh its cons in developing the modern world and generating values for future technologies.
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...civilization. It has revolutionized the peoples method of living and working. In this e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e to traffic jams, broken cars and so on,....But with the advent of a global conne...
^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...traffic jams, broken cars and so on,....But with the advent of a global connecting ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01910828025 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81028896123 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671974522293 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2819636011 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7058823529 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0916186706582 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249234595437 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283864410245 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499489238698 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190246965249 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.