When cars and cyclists use the same roads, there are often problems. Why is this case? What are the solutions?
Throughout the recent decades individuals have been more aware of massive amount of pollution which have been spread by cars that has propelled their demand of using bicycles instead of cars to be enlarged. Since then having same road for bicycles and other vehicles have had lots of difficulties such as high proportion of accidents. This issue which has led people to fear riding a bike in roads with cars has had several reasons. This essay will be considered not only those reasons, but also the solutions which should be taken in order to solve this significant problem.
To commence with, comparing the speed of bicycles and cars could direct humans to comprehend the main problem for allocating the same road for both of them. In other words, although wagons have been produced to reach the speed of higher than 200 Kilometers per hour, bicycles could not pass the 60 Kilometers per hour even under their best circumstance. Their various speeds have led them to have more accidents because of the lack of protection for cyclists. In fact, humans who ride a bike have been more fragile to high speeds, because they have not had any shelter similar to car bodies to be like deterrent to reduce the damages. Consequently, cars which have been driven in high speeds could be absolutely perilous for cyclist who have been delicate to be fallen or be hurt.
In addition, there have been some considerable solutions in order to be taken to have less accidents and troubles in roads. The first one is to separate their ways. For example, building new ones just for cyclist where they would be free to ride without having fear of colliding with other vehicles. But this solution may require a great deal of money in order to construct new roads, therefore, some specific methods should be taken to manufacture the same safe road for both of them. Since bicycles are more fragile to high speeds, a wide distance should be built to increase cyclists’ safety. For instance, locating some objects to be like deterrent between their roads. This could be extremely useful because not only cars could not be able to pass those objects to be in bicycles’ road, but also there would be a considerable distance between their ways which would lead the cyclists’ safety to be heightened.
In conclusion, devoting one road for all kinds of vehicles could be absolutely risky because they do not have the same qualities such as high speed or sturdy bodies to protect them of others’ impacts. Moreover, bicycles have not provided satisfying protection for their riders who have been hurt easily. For those reasons, assigning diverse roads for them or separating their ways with big objects could be suitable solutions to be taken.
- Using a computer every day can have more negative effects on young children Do you agree or disagree 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- linear process 78
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay Describe the information below and discuss the implication for dental health 67
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female worker in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Fredonia 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 87, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... solutions in order to be taken to have less accidents and troubles in roads. The fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2272.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 463.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90712742981 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5007478974 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466522678186 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8778226934 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.578947368 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36842105263 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142656407308 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572667950112 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482593678056 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110618237079 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499648456413 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.