When designing a building, the most important factor is the intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While some people put forward the view that the aesthetic qualities of a house are not as important as its intended use, I think that the two factors have an equally vital role in a house. Therefore I totally disagree with the first opinion.
On the one hand, the use function of a house should be the primary consideration at the design stage. The reason for this is that the dwelling constructed follow the purpose of users can bring many benefits for their health and experiences in the house. For instance, designing the office where a number of employees work at should focus on a wide variety of factors which can meet the worker’s requirements such as making the suitable light, clear campus and large space. As a result, these officers would feel comfortable during working time, which in turn could better effective productivity.
On the other hand, the design of building to serve a specific function, however, does not mean that their aesthetic qualities should be ignored. The motive which can be put forward to explain the argument is that a wonderful appearance of a house can bring a huge amount of profit for owners, especially those working in the tourism industry. Take museums for example. If buildings have a stunning look and are <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">sophisticatedly </span>decorated, more and more tourists can be attracted by the goods on display. Thus, owners of the museums could gain more admission fee through the increasing number of visitors.
In conclusion, building houses following the use of purpose or outside appearance seem to have various disadvantages. Nevertheless, designers need to pay attention to the two aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | bqcuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Nguyễn Đỗ Phước | 78 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Di 67
- Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graphs show figures relating to hours worked and stress levels amongst professional in eight groups. Decribe the information shown to a university or collage lecturer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... have an equally vital role in a house. Therefore I totally disagree with the first opini...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22344322344 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.12097517186 2.80592935109 147% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59706959707 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1167973152 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.692307692 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6153846154 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109445738841 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381716027871 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392239468602 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078830300722 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433842837986 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.