Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree
The idea that some people's success is attributed to luck instead of their own hard work still remains a source of controversy. Although there are reasons to justify, I definitely disagree with that opinion.
On the one hand, luck is just a small factor in determining someone's success. Firstly, people can not solely rely on luck to be successful. If a student who only depends on his luck without any studying, chances are he will fail for his exam. Secondly, no one can be lucky all the time. For example, thanks to winning lottery, a person can become a billionaire during a night. However, it is so clear that he can not win lottery all the rest of his life.
On the other hand, I believe that those who are industrious and patient will achieve their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thomas Edison, despite of more than ten thousand fail experiments, was always still patient with his job. As a result, he invented the light bulb which is a significant invention for both industry and daily life. Another example is Nick Vujicic, although he is a disability without limbs in Australia, he became a well-known motivative speaker. Furthermore, he fulfills conditions to get a bachelor degree in both accountancy and financial planning, and now he is traveling around the world to inspire to youth generation.
In conclusion, for these reasons mentioned above, I believe that success is not the result of luck but hard work and determined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck to what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 61
- whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some people say that the Internet is making the world smaller by bringing people together. To what extent do you agree that the internet is making it easier for people to communicate with one other? 56
- The world natural resources are being consumed at an over-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
The idea that some peoples success is attributed to luck instead o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...hieve their goals. Success always comes to hard working people. For instance, Thom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7374021437 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7916976048 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0807082347843 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292666044209 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351379688306 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544697575774 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258362319708 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.