While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree

In this knowledge-based society, knowledge means a lot of money. That is the reason why a lot of people choose to apply to a university for a more bright future. However, some argue that more people should be encouraged to take part in vocational training. In my opinion, I agree entirely with this idea.

Qualified workers play an integral role in our modern society. One primary reason is that there are countless construction projects that require the contribution of vocational employees. For example, new bridges or buildings need the contribution of these workers. If only academic workers are assigned to this task, the constructions are likely to fail since these workers do not have the same practical experience as those who have been through vocational training. Furthermore, human resources departments in corporations nowadays are prone to recruit workers who have been trained in their actual field of study. They need employees to have experience and can adapt effortlessly to their company culture. Thus, the role of vocational workers is becoming more and more important in the upcoming future.

Another reason is that the lack of trained workers is likely to lead to degradation in society. Issues such as household appliances error and facility degradation are not likely to be resolved if there are shortage of vocational workers applying for this working position. Another point is that, with many people engrossed in academic learning environments, the chance that there is a misbalance in the number of jobs may have the tendency to occur. The more people study an academic field and desire an academic job, the more the job pool of these specific occupations will probably be limited. This will lead to an increase in the unemployment rate of the entire nation.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...on in society. Issues such as household appliances error and facility degradation are not ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16494845361 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8736495712 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6360280491 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310574212279 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874832525694 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703694117043 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199563981521 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419136547583 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.