It is sometimes argued that the ultimate goal of science is to improve the living standard of humankind. In my opinion, although there are numerous significant objectives that can be achieved by science, I completely agree that its paramount focus should be on people.
First of all, science is conducted and improved entirely by humans. Thus, it seems reasonable that humans should prioritize themselves first when it comes to what the goal of science is. Only if people's living standard is increased, then science can bloom and be developed into further stages that can deal with other problems. Some opponents of this idea may argue that without other elements, humans could not have survived, therefore, they must make other goals become top priority. However, this argument is not sound since without humans, science would not have developed. Consequently, humans must first help themselves first before any other goals.
Another reason is that by improving human lives, the Earth can also be in a better situation. For example, with the continuous technological breakthrough, many developed nations nowadays are switching to renewable energy sources such as wind power and solar power. This change in the habit of using energy leads to a reduction in the usage of fossil fuels to generate energy for daily human lives. Thus, this development will result in less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, reducing the effects of global warming and helping to protect the Earth.
In conclusion, science is established and passed through many generations since the beginning of humankind. It is understandable that people set the criteria of improving their living environment first before other significant goals.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 56
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Agree or disagree 84
- Governments should support care vs finance for retired people While they should save money when they get older Discuss both views and give opinions 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34317343173 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7374602849 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612546125461 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3652771747 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161478358424 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057118634294 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285885159971 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962601937263 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213923647606 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.