While mobile phones have many advantages, a number of problems have also resulted from them or the ways in which they are used.
What are some of these problems? What solutions can you suggest for solving these problems?
It is totally understandable to say that technology, especially mobile phones, has reshaped our lives in many ways. Mobile technology was invented with the primary purpose is to help us to reduce the amount of time spent on social communicating. Nonetheless, there are also many issues created by how they are used, which would be discussed in this essay, as well as some possible solutions.
The fact that modern technology is becoming smarter and smarter relates to one of the biggest problems caused by mobile phones. People are able to access a large number of entertainment forms at any place just by using these mobile gadgets, so they tend to be less aware of society and more dependent on technology. It is not hard to recognize many groups of friends walking side-by-side but having their heads on smartphones instead of spending their time with each other. Moreover, when people have started to depend too much on smart technology, they would get lazier, and yet become unable to complete even simple daily tasks.
This issue, however, is not impossible to be eased. The most essential factor is humans’ self-awareness. People must learn how to control themselves, especially their needs of consuming media, and know clearly the importance of human-bonding. There are cases where parents overuse mobile phones in order to help them with children caring. Understanding this, some game providers have introduced products with limited consuming time and all-age-appropriate contents, which are now being expanded widely.
Even though mobile phones bring a defined number of benefits to human life, they still have many negative aspects. The most necessary resolution for these disadvantages is for people to raise awareness and control themselves from falling deeply into technology.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-29 | keval_1020 | 89 | view |
2021-02-17 | nmengg | 90 | view |
2020-02-15 | qhuy0168 | 78 | view |
2019-04-23 | DaliaMo | 47 | view |
2019-03-21 | hakobyan04.07 | 91 | view |
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries insufficient respect is shown to older people What do you think may be the reason for this What problems might this cause in society 84
- Water resources around the world are falling deficient Analyse the possible reasons and provide your suggestions 78
- Some people feel that entertainers e g film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...obile phones. People are able to access a large number of entertainment forms at any place just b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3298245614 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90766914528 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6712416703 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223011827081 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625313266506 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456289734939 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128228696117 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470246303433 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.