Wildlife animals
Human activities have been adversely affecting a vast number of species which is pushed to the verge of extinction. In this essay, I myself would explain lots of cautions more clearly and then suggest some solutions.
There are such reasons that the number of animals has been reduced. First of all, the most striking dimension is poaching contributing to the dramatic decrease in the size of species for extant purposes namely business and researching. Were sharks, tigers, rhinos, crocodiles and monkeys not hunted for body parts which are sold at extremely high prices, a huge variety of them would have not gone down much. According to the latest survey, the more extinct animals are, the more valuable products made from animals’ body parts and the richer hunters become. Besides, another purpose is the medical industry. Animals have been sought for more relevant right for improvement in human’s health and diseases.
Furthermore, has adverse contamination played a critical remarkable role not only on-land animals but also marine species. Many heavy industries are inflicting tremendous damage on animals’ natural habitats. Deforestation has become more and more popular to build factories and modernized infrastructure. On-land animals namely monkeys, lions, foxes and birds have not enough natural conditions to survive which diminishes the number of species. Moreover, either untreated waste or exploiting oil are transferred directly to the ocean causing the disappearance of many kinds of aquatic creatures.
In fact, there are several ways to protect wildlife animals out of extinction. To begin with, regarding the Government, it is extremely necessary to issues strict rules such as financial punishment and imprisonment to take control of human activities. A variety of illegal actions namely poaching, wasting and exploitation must be prohibited that keeps the natural habitat for species. In addition, the more promote campaigns on TV, the Internet and traditional communications have been organized, the more increase in residents’ awareness. Last but not least, protecting wildlife animals should be applied to education systems.
In conclusion, the shrinkage of wildlife animals has been to blame for human activities such as poaching and pollution. There are such appropriate protection measures I suggested that the society should maintain the size of species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-20 | thaokim2003 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | DNTMdntm | 11 | view |
| 2022-07-15 | DNTMdntm | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | nlnvdn1998 | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 56
- The plan below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63736263736 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96751624066 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2432972351 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279859564465 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917000975546 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121903322378 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148269054032 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820804535093 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.