The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now.
What problems will this cause?
What can be done to solve these problems?
There are numerous towns and urban areas constructed in previous centuries and that were more appropriate and worth living for individuals in those times than they are now. From my perspective, this phenomenon will cause some challenges for people in these areas to adapt to the advancement of current society and several solutions can be used to deal with this issue.
People who live in the long-term towns and cities can suffer from a great number of inferior problems. To begin with, the infrastructures in these areas are outdated and cannot be ensured to provide humans with safe environments which will bring about several risky consequences. To be specific, the structure of the buildings that have not been checked on a regular basis and reconstructed for a long time is capable of resulting in collapse which will be extremely hazardous for humans or even loss of life due to the free-falling debris. Additionally, people living in outmoded towns and cities will be unable to catch up with the development of the world because all equipment in these areas is not well-qualified for the inhabitants to follow consistent modifications of the world such as insufficient transportations, outdated technological gadgets and others. Subsequently, it will cause backward for the citizens, and it will be one of the typical factors that hinder the economic advancement of a country.
To overcome these challenges, people should propose some reasonable measures or strategies to tackle the consequences of this issue. Supreme authorities had better subsidize for the citizens to improve their living conditions and assist them with the investment to upgrade the facilities such road system, accommodations, public transportation and other things that are essential for their daily life. On the other hand, the local government had better commute to these areas to strike up a conversation with each resident to persuade them to reconstruct the old buildings together with a view to guarantee safety and get rid of dangerous repercussions or they can make these ancient towns and cities become a tourist-oriented area for both domestic and foreign tourists to prolong the existence of these areas.
In conclusion, by adopting a balanced approach to preservation, investing in infrastructure and accessibility, and fostering local engagement, older cities can overcome inherent challenges and regain their livability. Only through such concerted efforts can old towns and cities be restored and cherished for generations to come.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 78
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38287153652 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18362001943 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554156171285 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0714671919 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.083333333 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0833333333 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303552086286 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11640364974 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730389582304 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19347995053 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960831026693 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.