The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now.
What problems will this cause?
What can be done to solve these problems?
There now exist numerous towns and cities that were constructed centuries ago. While these places were once considered livable, they often face challenges in meeting the needs and expectations of contemporary society that can only realistically be resolved by local authorities.
One of the primary challenges associated with old towns and cities is outdated infrastructure and limited accessibility. Many of these places were designed before the advent of private vehicles and modern transportation systems. Consequently, narrow streets, lack of parking facilities, and insufficient public transportation options pose significant challenges for mobility and convenience. Similarly, outdated sewage and waste management systems may not be equipped to handle the needs of a larger population, leading to environmental and health hazards. One well-known example of this would be in developing cities such as Ho Chi Minh city in Vietnam where older buildings that collapse are common and there are geographical challenges that limit the development of other areas. Since local authorities have few options, this means many less privileged residents must live in conditions that are not ideal.
To overcome these challenges, a comprehensive revitalization plan is crucial. Local governments should invest in infrastructure upgrades, such as widening roads, improving public transportation networks, and implementing smart traffic management systems. Additionally, the integration of sustainable solutions, including renewable energy sources and eco-friendly waste management systems, can contribute to the long-term livability of these areas. By prioritizing infrastructure development and accessibility enhancements, old towns and cities can adapt to modern demands without compromising their historical integrity. Local governments can also, in collaboration with residents and stakeholders, organize cultural events, festivals, and initiatives to celebrate the heritage of these areas. This holistic support will prolong and support revitalization efforts long-term.
In conclusion, by adopting a balanced approach to preservation, investing in infrastructure and accessibility, and fostering local engagement, older cities can overcome inherent challenges and regain their livability. Only through such concerted efforts can old towns and cities be restored and cherished for generations to come
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 You should write at least 150 words 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- the process illustrate how the recycled paper is made 78
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29393939394 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44925299002 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6785705926 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8125 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196763746593 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065173532903 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503781906684 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128489955054 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398208681193 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.34 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.2 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.