You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic: Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
It is believed that the environment is unlikely to be bettered by individuals; merely authorities and large companies can make an improvement. In the following essay, I will discuss both sides and put forth my viewpoint.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that governments and companies with large scale can only spur volunteers to protect the environment nationwide. This is because when a large number of people, especially the young with great enthusiasm collect bottles, clean the streets or plant trees, the environment and atmosphere may be ameliorated. Another feasible explanation is that only authorities and large firms are likely to host sections regarding solutions to problems of our surroundings. For instance, according to the surveys carried out by Queen’s University, 200 sections are organized by governments, resulting in an increase in the residents’ awareness of the importance of saving the environment. Through this lens, it is understandable why the environment can be only improved by both governments and large companies.
On the other hand, those who disagree point out that not only authorities but also individuals may take actions which make great inroads in the environment and there are multifarious reasons to endorse this view. Admittedly, each person can encourage other people to save our surroundings by utilising social media. By posting information about the environment on Facebook or Instagram, a large quantity of people are able to have access to it; therefore, they will acquire much knowledge and start acting for a better planet. Another justification worth mentioning here is that every parent can teach their offspring about the world surrounding them when they were at the age of 5. By way of illustration, evidence from recent research in Britain suggests that approximately 100 children in each school of this country are aware of saving the planet by virtue of their parents’ teaching during their childhood.
All things considered, convincing as two viewpoints may appear at first, I am assured to say that beside governments and large firms, individuals can also fortify the environment effectively. This is more logic-based according to the above assumptions.
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task You have had a problem with your next door neighbour You have not been able to speak to your neighbour about this Write a letter to this neighbour In your letter Explain the problem Suggest a solution Say wha 64
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Your friend is thinking about learning to drive and would like some advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter say why a driving licence is advantageous recommend a driving school give any extra guidance tips 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...onment nationwide. This is because when a large number of people, especially the young with great...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4265129683 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14981240297 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593659942363 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.92400255 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7857142857 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247827804548 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818834163602 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571584480285 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142804727916 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264756591156 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.