Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages
There is a growing recognition that young individuals tend to be impacted by same-aged people. I believe that the merits from the phenomenon would overshadow its drawbacks.
There are two major pitfalls originated from the implication that young people have on each other. The first issue is that by acknowledging the success of other peers, young people may feel inferior to their counterparts. This leads to the lack of confidence among the young and makes them feel difficult to socialize. Their social lives suffer as a result. An additional downsize is that, the impacts of extrinsic factors tend to more severe on young people, whose psychological development is still incomplete. This prevents them from achieving their personal goals and even quitting their on-going deeds which holds the key for their later feat in life. Thus, peer pressure takes its toll on the natural growth of youngster, which not only impairs their socialbility but discourages them from obtaining their objectives.
Apart from negative outcomes, peer pressure may act as a driving force for the self-development of many young people. The first merit from the phenomenon is that youngsters may immitate their more successful friends' pattern of behaviors which implies the success of one later in life. Secondly, given over-confident attitudes of young individuals, they would be encouraged to bridge the gap with their friends while their flourishment. More importantly, peer pressure often goes hand in hand with competition, the element plays a crucial role in any developed community, which motivates ones to work hard, and become more well-rounded individuals. The success of certain young individuals exerts positive influences on people at their age, which provides the ordinary with encouragement, role models and competion.
In the light of these facts, I concur with the view that the advantage of peer pressure is weightier than its disadvantages. the pressure from same-aged people is one of main precursors to the progession of ones in life, albeit there are some minor pitfalls affecting their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | TTmy | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-15 | iambest | 11 | view |
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 89
- Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... personal goals and even quitting their on-going deeds which holds the key for their lat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...re is weightier than its disadvantages. the pressure from same-aged people is one o...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, apart from, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37575757576 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93979378724 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2212020688 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303655605255 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096293653734 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508104929162 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181400695465 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609910765949 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.