Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages

Irrefutably, manner in which young blood remain themselves motivate has been changed immensely across globally. Companions have great aftermath on their friends. This effect have positive consequence and also dire repercussion on them. This essay elaborate both the outcomes with supporting details and relevant example owing to logical conclusion.
On the one hand, there are innumerable merits drawn by mature people. The cardinal points to be considered company of good and successful peers due to which they take motivation form them try to confer hundred percent in life for breakthrough. Another prominent positive points freedom of communications by which young blood can easily talk of any particular situation and problem to their best friend. Perfect solution is given by their peers which make clear path in life. finally, last but not the least, good deeds of friends always push them to do right thing for society and keep them in a good company for future prospects. For instance, according to survey of oxford university individuals who are contact with good friends commit less crime then other who are in bad company.
On the other hand, there are few negative outcomes which cannot be ignored. The provoking factor behind this bad habits of their friends always have wrong impact on them by which young people nowdays easily get influenced. For example, research of MIT says that majority of mature people consume drugs and alchohole by tempering form their friends.
To conclude, having discuss the both aspect pertaining to influence of peers. although there are minor negative ramification on young blood, advantages of peers are immense which definitely outbalance the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...aftermath on their friends. This effect have positive consequence and also dire repe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ir peers which make clear path in life. finally, last but not the least, good deeds of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...survey of oxford university individuals who are contact with good friends commit less c...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 750, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...act with good friends commit less crime then other who are in bad company. On the o...
^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...spect pertaining to influence of peers. although there are minor negative ramification o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'ramifications'?
Suggestion: ramifications
...eers. although there are minor negative ramification on young blood, advantages of peers are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...initely outbalance the disadvantages.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36059479554 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66713015877 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631970260223 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2799637927 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161045983144 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517445403652 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354233886125 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100660230461 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234063213663 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.